Legal Opinion
Spannaus v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly, & Lindgren, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1985No. C4-84-1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellants Roy T. Spannaus and Camelot Chateau Corporation, Inc., sued respondents, a law firm and an individual lawyer, alleging legal malpractice. This appeal is from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of respondents. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants, an individual and a corporation, were the general partners in a limited partnership known as Camelot Chateau Apartments. In 1971, the partnership became involved in plans for constructing apartments in St. Paul. The limited partners voted to remove appellants as general partners effective in August 1974.
As part of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Blue Water Corp., Inc. v. O'TOOLESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Connolly v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Gramling v. MEMORIAL BLOOD CENTERSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- MacAwber Engineering, Inc. v. Robson & Miller Morton S. Robson Kenneth N. Miller, Abdo & Abdo, P.A. Steven R. HedgesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Fredin v. Halberg Criminal DefenseDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020