Legal Opinion

Sherrill v. . Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon the trial defendant admitted the delivery of the message for transmission, the payment of costs therefor and, further, that the telegram had never been delivered to Franklin Sherrill, for whom it was intended. The message was delivered to defendant company at Lebanon, Ind., by the witness Booher, acting for the sender, and was in words and figures as follows:

"Max, Ind., 1 Dec. 1890. Mr. Franklin Sherrill, Statesville, N.C.: Tell Henry to come home. Lou is bad sick. M. C. Sherrill.
"Tel. ans. quick; it's paid for here.
"16 pd. $3.50 gt. spl. dely."

It appeared that plaintiff, who is referred…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Young v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Clary's Administrators v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  3. Hendricks v. W. U. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Denmark v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Deans v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cashion v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. State v. . HauserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Roberts v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. . JourneganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API