State v. . Journegan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Concurrence
"WalKee, J.,
concurring: I agree with the opinion and conclusion of the Court in this case, for the same reason and partly upon the same ground that I refused my assent to the opinion in the case of In re Peterson, 136 N. C., 13, at page 28, though for reasons there stated I concurred in the result, a new trial having been awarded.
It is not competent for a witness, especially a nonexpert, to give bis opinion, for instance, as to whether a testator or a grantor in a deed bad or bad not sufficient mental capacity to execute the particular instrument in question, and much less is it competent for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Clary's Administrators v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
- Fairchild v. BascombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
- Tillett v. Norfolk & Western R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- State v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.