Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. . Journegan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1923Published

1Concurrence

"WalKee, J.,

concurring: I agree with the opinion and conclusion of the Court in this case, for the same reason and partly upon the same ground that I refused my assent to the opinion in the case of In re Peterson, 136 N. C., 13, at page 28, though for reasons there stated I concurred in the result, a new trial having been awarded.

It is not competent for a witness, especially a nonexpert, to give bis opinion, for instance, as to whether a testator or a grantor in a deed bad or bad not sufficient mental capacity to execute the particular instrument in question, and much less is it competent for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clary's Administrators v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  2. Fairchild v. BascombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  3. Tillett v. Norfolk & Western R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. State v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API