Baranowski v. Wetzel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Frank Wetzel and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 21st day of December, 1915, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the Queens County Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Putnam, J.:
Plaintiff in 1898 purchased two lots in what had been known as Maspeth, which are referred to as the “Jay Avenue” lots, described in the city assessment roll as lot 35, block 24, in the second ward of the borough of Queens. In 1909 Frederick and Gustav Eaber acquired the William street lots in what before consolidation had been Newtown. In the assessment roll (but in a different volume) they were also described as lot 35, block 24, in the second ward of the borough of Queens. In the second ward of that borough were still other lots described by these same lot and block numbers.
On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mayer v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . HavenNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Pease v. . EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Curnen v. . the MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Sidenberg v. . ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McMillan v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Central Wisconsin Trust Co. v. SwensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Loconti v. City of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Battlefields, Inc. v. County Legislature of RocklandNew York Supreme Court · 1976