Legal Opinion
Loconti v. City of Utica
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamons, J.
The plaintiffs move for summary judgment in an action instituted by them against the City of Utica to recover for 1967 real property taxes paid to the city.
The plaintiffs’ real property, located at 1919 Dwyer Avenue, Utica, was appropriated by the State of New York by condemnation. The State took title on October 31, 1966. During the year 1967 the plaintiffs, without being aware of the fact that the State’s filing of a map constituted a taking of the title, and having received as they claim in the oral argument, tax bills *856from the City of Utica for city taxes for the year 1967, paid the same.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mayer v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Waite v. LeggettNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Matter of McCue v. . SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Matter of Village of DelhiNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Lesster v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Long Island Power Authority v. Shoreham-Wading River Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Battlefields, Inc. v. County Legislature of RocklandNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Browne v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979