Buffalo Land & Exploration Co. v. Hugh P. Strong
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants William H. Adams and Maria L. Adams from an order of the district court for Lake county, Cant, J., granting a motion to dismiss their demand for a second trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Trial of this action was had in the court below, and judgment ordered against defendants Adams to'the effect that plaintiff was the own*28er of the land in controversy, that defendants had no right, claim, estate,- or interest therein, and that plaintiff have and recover of them the sum of $32.99, costs and disbursements of the action. Judgment was entered May 4, 1903. Thereafter, on November 2, 1903, defendants paid the costs and made proper demand for a second trial. In October, 1906, plaintiff moved the court to set aside and dismiss the demand, on the ground that the action was not one in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- William Deering & Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Finch v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Deering Harvester Co. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- McCarthy v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Phillips v. MoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Todd v. BetttngenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Eckerly v. LAKE REGION SIGN COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Bracken v. TronesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Tew v. WebsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908