Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Stordahl

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1958No. Docket 11, Calendar 47,022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The plaintiff fidelity insurers, having duly succeeded to the presently unveiled rights of the Commonwealth Bank of Detroit, filed this bill for declaration of a constructive trust and related relief against defendants Calmar M. Stordahl and Grace A. Stordahl, husband and wife. The chancellor, following trial of issues made by the bill and separate answers filed by Mr. and Mrs. Stordahl, entered a decree vesting title to 3 lots (comprising in all the home premises of Mr. and Mrs. Stordahl) in plaintiffs as designated tenants in common and as beneficiaries of a trust identifying Mr. Stordahl…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Newlove v. CallaghanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pegg v. PeggMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. JosselynMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Taylor v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Distral Energy Corp. v. Michigan Boiler & Engineering Co. (In Re Michigan Boiler & Engineering Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  3. Croy v. DavidMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API