Legal Opinion

Rome Manufacturing Co. v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1935No. 32,049PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*386The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action in replevin brought in Sedgwick county. From the petition it appears plaintiff is a foreign corporation; that in January, 1930, at Kansas City, Mo., it sold to Mrs. F. C. Baird a certain motor grader for which she gave notes for future payments; that by the written contract of sale title to the grader was retained by plaintiff until the notes were paid; that Mrs. Baird never had paid any of the notes, and that by reason thereof plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession of the grader; “that it has demanded the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Boynton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. McCandliss Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Payne v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Barker v. Hufty Rock Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. State ex rel. Logan v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Gresty v. DarbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Atchison v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Verdigris River Drainage District No. 1 v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API