Legal Opinion

Barker v. Hufty Rock Asphalt Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1933No. 30,891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The plaintiff, Mary Barker, was an employee of the Hufty Rock Asphalt Company, which owed her $350 for services as stenographer, and payment not having been made upon demand, she brought this action against the Hufty Rock Asphalt Company to recover the amount due. On the same day she procured the issuance of an attachment to be levied upon the property, including the goods, chattels, credits, moneys and effects of the defendant in Shawnee county. The sheriff, to whom the writ was directed, served it upon the auditor of the state highway…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. McCandliss Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Heman Construction Co. v. CapperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Purity Oats Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Asbell v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Spangler v. Florida State Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. State ex rel. Boynton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Gresty v. DarbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API