Legal Opinion
Ultracashmere House, Ltd. v. Springs Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 23, 1987No. 87-1129PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
Ultracashmere House, Ltd. (UHL) appeals from the final decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, in Opposition No. 62,670 dated April 10, 1986 (unreported), refusing to register the mark ULTRACASHMERE under section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d), because of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark ULTRASUEDE owned by opposer Springs Mills, Inc. We affirm.
I
UHL filed an application, Serial No. 168,-257, on April 27, 1978, seeking registration of the mark ULTRACASHMERE for “woven cashmere-like fabrics.” Springs Mills…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- American International Group, Inc. v. London American International Corporation Limited and Midland Bank LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation's Foodservice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Spring Mills, Inc. v. Ultracashmere House, Ltd. And Bart SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CFE Racing Products, Inc. v. BMF Wheels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- McBride v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
- Nike, Inc. v. Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2011