Legal Opinion
Nike, Inc. v. Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
Decided August 9, 2011No. 91188789Published
1Opinion of the Court
THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE T.T.A.B. Mailed: August 9, 2011 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ______ Nike, Inc. v. Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher _____ Opposition No. 91188789 to application Serial No. 77539642 filed on 8/5/2008 _____ Michelle L. Calkins of Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd. for Nike, Inc. Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher, pro se. ______ Before Walters, Bergsman and Wolfson, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Wolfson, Administrative Trademark Judge: Applicants, Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher, filed a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Starbucks Corp. v. Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.