Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1976No. 42PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The defendant, an indigent, was entitled to representation by counsel at his trial and it was the duty of the trial court to appoint competent counsel so to represent him, unless the defendant voluntarily and understandingly waived his right thereto. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed. 2d 799 (1963). Conversely, a defendant, so charged with a criminal offense, has the right, if he so elects, to conduct his own defense without counsel. The services of counsel unsatisfactory to him may not be forced upon him. State v. Alston, 272 N.C. 278, 158 S.E. 2d 52…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. James Earl Young, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. State v. SneedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API