Legal Opinion
In Re Catfish Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided November 17, 1995No. Master No. 2:92cv73-D-O. MDL 928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
Presently before the court are motions of the defendants ConAgra, Country Skillet, Delta Pride, Hormel and Farm Fresh for the entry of summary judgment on their behalf. Pursuant to this opinion, the court shall hold in abeyance a portion of the motions and shall deny the remainder.
BACKGROUND 1
I., THE CATFISH PRICE-FIXING CONSPIRACY
A. PROLOGUE
The named plaintiffs in this litigation are food distributors who purchased catfish and catfish products from 1981 until 1990, from various companies that were engaged in the business of processing and selling…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Catfish Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Baker's Carpet Gallery, Inc. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- Wallace v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2014