Legal Opinion

ETAN INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Lehmann

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 26, 2010No. 03-07-00539-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice.

This appeal from a judgment following a jury trial arises from a dispute between appellant Etan Industries, Inc. and Etan Industries, Inc., d/b/a CMA Cablevision and/or CMA Communications (“Etan”) over its authority to install, own, and operate fiber optic and coaxial cable lines on land owned by appellees Ronald and Dana Lehmann without the Lehmanns’ permission. The jury found that (i) Etan trespassed and made a negligent misrepresentation concerning one of two properties, (ii) $15,000 would reasonably compensate the Lehmanns for their damages that resulted…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Etan Industries, Inc. v. LehmannTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. AbshireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. ETAN INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Lehmann, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  4. John Hall and Roberta Wagner v. Karen Seal and Russell Seal, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API