Legal Opinion

Cressy v. Grassmann

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 22, 1995No. C5-95-886, C7-95-887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellants challenge summary judgment for respondent personal injury victims, arguing that the district court erroneously upheld the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 169.685, subd. 4. We affirm.

FACTS

In October 1993, respondent Pamela Cres-sy (Cressy) and her minor son Michael Cres-sy were injured when the car Cressy was driving was struck from behind by a bus, driven by appellant Steven Grassmann and owned by appellant Salden Bus Service, Inc. Cressy sued appellants, alleging that Grass-mann’s negligence caused the accident. Appellants raised as defenses Cressy’s failure…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Miller Brewing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Matter of HarhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Leonard v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees Council 65 v. Blue Earth CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Anker v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Delano Community Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API