Legal Opinion
Neiss v. Burwen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 25, 1934PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of tort to recover for the conscious suffering and death of the plaintiff’s intestate, Walter J. Neiss. The declaration, which is in two counts, alleges in the first that on the second day of September, 1928, the intestate, while in the employ of the defendant, suffered severe personal injury caused by a defect in the condition of the ways, works, or machinery of the defendant arising by reason of the negligence of the defendant, and that the existence of this defect was unknown to the employee; that as a result of the injury, the employee suffered severely and died, leaving…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Mulhall v. FallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Duggan v. OgdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Liggett Drug Co. v. License CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Town Crier, Inc. v. Chief of Police of WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Ruschetti's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.