Legal Opinion

Nilsson v. Continental MacHine Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 7, 1993No. 2-92-1216PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger

Plaintiff, Lori Ann Nilsson, appeals the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment to defendant, Continental Machine Manufacturing Company (CMM), on plaintiff’s two-count complaint alleging products liability and negligence. Plaintiff contends that the court erred in granting summary judgment where issues of material fact existed concerning whether defendant corporation was a “mere continuation” of the manufacturer of the machine which injured plaintiff. Alternatively, plaintiff urges this court to adopt the “product line” theory of products liability.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Vesey v. Chicago Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Mitchell v. Jewel Food StoresIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Nguyen v. Johnson MacHine & Press Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Vernon v. SchusterIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Harry F. Chaveriat, Jr. v. Williams Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Steel Co. v. Morgan Marshall Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Krol v. Wilcek (In Re H. King & Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API