United States v. Rogers
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
In these six eases, defendants charged with unlawful possession and transportation of intoxicating beverages contest nothing hut the lawfulness of search, seizure, and evidence’ so secured, save Starx* contends in any event he is not guilty.
Adverting to thorn in order, in the first or Rogers case it appears that July 22, 1930, 5 a. m., a state trooper patrolling a Jersey highway met a truck which was of Pennsylvania license plates, unknown to the trooper, “appeared suspicious,” and as he lawfully might for various reasons pursuant to local law, blew Ms whistle in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Gambino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- McInes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Bahsoon v. Pezetel, Ltd.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1991