Legal Opinion

McInes v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1932No. 6906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the court below of possessing and transporting intoxicating liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act (title 2, § 3 [27 USCA § 12]). Trial by jury was waived. Prior to the trial a motion for the suppression of the evidence on the ground of an illegal search and seizure was denied after a hearing thereon. This appeal is from that ruling. The only question is whether or not the search and seizure without a warrant of appellant’s automobile and the liquor contained therein •was valid. The liquor then and there seized is the same for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. RogersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. State v. BurnettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Sorrentino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Drouin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Cannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API