In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & REASONS
[As to the Motions to Dismiss the Pure Stigma, BP Dealer, and Recreation Claims]
CARL BARBIER, District Judge.
Before the Court are certain Defendants’ 1 motions to dismiss the “Pure Stigma Claims,” “BP Dealer Claims,” and “Recreation Claims.”2 Oral argument was held on September 14, 2012. Having considered counsel’s arguments, the relevant record, and the applicable law, the Court finds the motions should be GRANTED as set forth below.
I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This matter 'arises from the April 20, 2010 blowout, explosion, and fire aboard the DEEPWATER HORIZON…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Baker v. PutnalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Loggerhead Holdings v. BPCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Settoon Towing, L.L.C. v. Marquette Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017