Whittier v. Hollister
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Per curiam
This is an action to enforce a lien for materials furnished to a sub-contractor, which were used in the construction of a building on the premises of the defendant Hollister. The building was erected in pursuance of a contract. There is no allegation in the complaint that any money was due *284or to become due from the owner to the contractor. The defendant Hollister demurred to the complaint.
The question involved in this appeal was disposed of in Latson v. Nelson, 11 Pac. C. L. J. 589.
The judgment, so far as it relates to the defendant Hollister, and so far as it concerns the real estate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Renton v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Wells v. CahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wiggins v. BridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Nason v. JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Wilson v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Doggett v. BellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885