Wells v. Cahn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco¡ ■ Action to enforce the lien of a material-man for material furnished the contractor.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco¡ ■ Action to enforce the lien of a material-man for material furnished the contractor. The complaint averred that the defendant Cahn was the owner of a lot in San Francisco, and caused a building to,be erected thereon, and that the plaintiff, between the 29th day of May and the 23d day of September, 1874, furnished J. S. Coulter, who had contracted with Cahn to erect the building, mouldings and mill-work for the building, which were used in its construction, and that the same had not been paid for; that…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
The amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure have wrought no change in the act of March 30, 1868, in any respect involved in this case. The views expressed here in Renton v. Conley (49 Cal. 185), are decisive of this appeal, and upon the authority of that case the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Renton v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by4 opinions
- James Hunter & Co. v. Truckee LodgeNevada Supreme Court · 1879
- Whittier v. HollisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Nason v. JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- James Hunter & Co. v. Truckee LodgeNevada Supreme Court · 1879