Legal Opinion
Kramer v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF BALTIMORE COUNTY
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 9, 2011No. Civil Action WMN-10-2346PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 10. The motion is fully briefed. Upon review of the motion and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that the motion will be denied.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Ann Kramer brings this action alleging that she was denied promotions on the basis of her gender and that she was paid less than men employed by Defendant doing the same work as her. Plaintiff has been employed by Defendant Board of Education of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Erin Dindinger, Lisa Loring, and Elizabeth Freund v. Allsteel, Inc. and Scott MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Amended May 14, 2015 Erin Dindinger, Lisa Loring, and Elizabeth Freund v. Allsteel, Inc. and Scott MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Arielle Mbarga Ndzie v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Blackmon v. SpahnDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Blagmon v. Hanover CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.