Legal Opinion

Transport Clearing Northwest v. Bardahl Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 18, 1978No. 5790-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

In 1975 Bardahl Manufacturing Co. (Bar-dahl) shipped goods to various consignees employing the services of four separate carriers. The bills of lading were completed by Bardahl and contained the standard nonre-course provision which reads:

Subject to Section 7 of conditions of applicable bill of lading:

If this shipment is to be delivered to the consignee without recourse on the consignor, the consignor shall sign the following statement:

The carrier shall not make delivery of this shipment without payment of freight and other lawful charges.

Bardahl signed this statement. The bills of lading…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Felton v. Menan Starch Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Arizona Feeds v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. National Milling Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alaska Marine Trucking v. Carnation Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Circle Airfreight v. Boyce EquipmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API