Legal Opinion

Circle Airfreight v. Boyce Equipment

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 3, 1987No. 860148-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

JACKSON, Judge:

Appellant Boyce Equipment seeks reversal of a judgment awarding respondent money due for airfreight services rendered. We affirm.

On August 9, 1982, Boyce Equipment contracted with Circle Airfreight for prepaid freight delivery of machine parts described on a written Shipper’s Letter of Instruction, signed on appellant’s behalf by Mark Boyce after appellant’s employee had marked the “prepaid” box. Upon receipt of the cargo, respondent’s freight agent prepared an air waybill, copies of which were sent to appellant several weeks later. Circle Airfreight had the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. John Call Engineering, Inc. v. Manti City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Arizona Feeds v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Porter v. GrooverUtah Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crowther v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Brigham City v. Mantua TownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Sather v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. Brigham City v. Mantua TownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. Crowther v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API