Legal Opinion

Alaska Marine Trucking v. Carnation Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 10, 1981No. 9226-0-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

— The Carnation Company appeals a judgment in favor of Alaska Marine Trucking (AMT) for $91,100.82 in freight charges. Alaska Marine Trucking cross-appeals the trial court's conclusion of law that it would be estopped from collecting at least part of the freight charges under ordinary rules of equity.

For about 25 years, Carnation sold dairy products to Meadowmoor Alaska Dairy (Meadowmoor). Carnation shipped these products to Meadowmoor in Alaska via interstate carriers designated by Meadowmoor. By 1977, Meadowmoor had become a bad credit risk. It owed Carnation a considerable amount of money…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Arnold v. MelaniWashington Supreme Court · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Brust v. McDONALD'S CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Housing Authority v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer & Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Grabber Construction Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Burlington NRR v. GRABBER CONSTR. SUPPLYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API