Legal Opinion

Tutak v. Fairley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 9, 1991No. A90A2166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Presiding Judge.

Acting on behalf of their minor son, Gregory, the appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Tutak, brought this action against the appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Fairley, seeking to recover for injuries Gregory had allegedly sustained when he was bitten by the appellees’ dog. The present appeal is from the grant of the appellees’ motion for summary judgment.

The appellees normally kept their dog, a 45-pound mixed breed German shepherd, chained to a doghouse in the backyard of their home; but at the time of the attack on Gregory, it had broken loose from its chains. Mr. Fairley testified that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fields v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. WarendhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Oertel v. Chi Psi FraternityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Johnston v. WarendhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Oertel v. Chi Psi FraternityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. SOCORRO ESPINOZA v. JUAN MORELCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API