Legal Opinion

State v. Odegaard

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1969No. Cr. 379PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Judge.

In this appeal we are asked to determine the constitutionality of a statute which, with certain exceptions, requires the operator of or a passenger on a motorcycle to wear a crash helmet.

By criminal information dated October 17, 1967, Mr. Harold J. Odegaard was charged with the offense of failing to wear a crash helmet while riding a motorcycle. Although we have only an abbreviated transcript of the trial court proceedings, it appears from that transcript and from Mr. Odegaard’s brief that when the case came on for trial before the Cass County Court with Increased…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Village of Orchard LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Colvin v. LombardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. CromwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Grocers Dairy Co. v. Department of Agriculture DirectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Love v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Kingery v. ChappleAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Wichita v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. People v. KohrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Apple Creek Township v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API