Legal Opinion

O'CONNELL v. Christenson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2003No. S-10626PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Kevin O'Connell appeals a superior court order that imputed income to him and modified his child support obligation accordingly. . Because the superior court failed to issue findings sufficient to justify the imputed income, we vacate the court's order and remand the case for further proceedings.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Kevin O'Connell and Kathleen Christenson are the parents of two children. O'Connell and Christenson were never married and never resided together with the children. O'Connell lives in Anchorage. Christenson resides near Fairbanks.

In May…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lacher v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Dunn v. DunnAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Adrian v. AdrianAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Olmstead v. ZieglerAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ward v. UrlingAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Barlow v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Horne v. TouhakisAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Reilly v. NorthrupAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Rosenblum v. PeralesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API