Reilly v. Northrup
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael Reilly and Jaime Vinette 1 engaged in a non-marital relationship which resulted in the birth of their son Barlow. 2 Reilly subsequently ceased to be employed in Alaska and moved to Butte, Montana, where he worked part time repairing and renting out homes and managing a bar. Vinette has custody of Barlow during the school year, and Reilly has custody for six weeks during the summer.
Reilly moved to have his child support modified to reflect the fact that his income had fallen. Vinette countered that he was voluntarily underemployed. Reilly claimed…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Bailey v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Wetzler v. WetzlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Patch v. PatchAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Horne v. TouhakisAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Dara v. GishAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Sharpe v. SharpeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Bruce H. v. Jennifer L.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Fredrickson v. ButtonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.