Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Boyle

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2006No. 05-258PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bruce Boyle (Husband) appeals from the property disposition in the decree granting Renee Boyle’s (Wife) complaint for divorce. Husband asserts the district court erred by classifying his employment benefits, including banked hours, vacation hours, and sick leave, as marital property. He also claims the district court abused its discretion in dividing the parties’ property. We conclude the issue of whether Husband’s employment benefits were marital property was not properly presented to the district court and, therefore, decline to consider his argument on appeal. Further,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Carlton v. CarltonWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Metz v. MetzWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Oatts v. JorgensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayzlett v. HayzlettWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cameron Kdell Bagley v. Angela S. BagleyWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Union Pacific R. Co. v. Caballo Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Sanning v. SanningWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. John David Morrison v. Peggy Sue Rubio f/k/a Peggy Sue MorrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API