Sanning v. Sanning
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[11] The district court awarded a cabin to Jamison Sanning (Wife) as part of the property distribution incorporated into the parties' divorcee decree. Lee Sanning (Husband) claims the district court abused its discretion by relying upon sentimental value to award the cabin to Wife and the court's factual findings regarding the cabin were not supported by the trial evidence.
[12] We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion and affirm.
ISSUES
[T3] Husband presents the following issues on appeal:
1. Whether a divorcing spouse's claimed "sentimental value" in joint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. NunezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Broyles v. BroylesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Wallop v. WallopWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Welch v. WelchWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Sweat v. SweatWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Daniel L. Stevens v. Kacie J. StevensWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- John Leslie Chapman v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Olsen v. OlsenWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Susan Lynn Kummerfeld v. John Gary KummerfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Dustin Lee Yearout v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.