Benicia Agricultural Works v. Germania Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action to recover for the loss of a certain harvesting machine and outfit, insured by defendant against loss from fire. The court below granted a nonsuit, and rendered judgment for defendant. From the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial, the plaintiff appealed.
The policy ran in terms for a period of one year from June 12, 1890, to June 12, 1891; but, after reciting the character of the property, it contained the following clause: “ All while owned by assured, and known as the Harvest King harvesting machine and outfit, and operating in the grain-fields, and in transit…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Steil v. Sun Insurance OfficeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Aachen & Munich Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Agalianos v. American Central InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Slinkard v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Rizzuto v. National Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.