Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Aachen & Munich Fire Insurance
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Page, McCutchen, Harding & Knight, and Page, McCutchen & Knight, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
There are two appeals in this case, one from the judgment in favor of defendant, and one from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The two appeals come before us on one record.
The action was brought to recover on a policy of reinsurance issued by the defendant to plaintiff. From the record in the case it appears that plaintiff and defendant were engaged in the business of fire insurance in the states of California, Oregon, and elsewhere at all the times mentioned in the complaint. The court found: “That at all of said times there were situated upon the premises of the Salem…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Columbia Insurance Company of Alexandria, in Error v. Joseph W. Lawrence, Who Survived Thomas PoindexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bryce v. . Lorillard Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Arff v. Star Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Jenny Lind Co. v. Bower & Co.California Supreme Court · 1858
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ascherman v. General Reinsurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Globe National Fire Insurance v. American Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Royal Ins. Co. v. Caledonian Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Empire Life Ins. Co. v. LandmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Southern Surety Co. v. Equitable Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.