Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hubbard v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1990No. S009697Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent. Unlike the majority, I find the scholarly analysis and conclusion of the Court of Appeal to be persuasive. This is not a case for summary judgment; rather, there is a factual conflict that should proceed to trial.

I adopt as my own the opinion prepared for the Court of Appeal by Acting Presiding Justice Sparks, with appropriate deletions and additions, as follows: †

[ ] We come to the central dispute between the parties—the application of [Civil Code] section 846 [(hereafter section 846)]. Plaintiff claims that defendant’s grazing permit “can be construed as at the very most, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Delta Farms Reclamation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. O'Shea v. Claude C. Wood Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API