Legal Opinion
State v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 1986No. C2-85-1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, Judge.
Stephen Arnold Palmer appeals his conviction for driving under the influence and driving with a blood-alcohol concentration over .10 in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.-121, subd. 1(a) and (d) (1984) and the denial of his motion for a new trial, citing errors in a number of evidentiary rulings. He further claims that the verdict was not justified by the evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Stephen Palmer was arrested for DWI and driving with an alcohol concentration over .10 on October 13, 1984. He was taken to the local police station, where he was read the implied consent form and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State, Department of Public Safety v. HabischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MeldrumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Nelson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992