Legal Opinion

Meramec Spring Park Co. v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 5, 1916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Crawford Circuit Court. — Eon. R. A. Breuer, Judge. (1) -By the general law in force at the time the Meramec Iron Company was incorporated it was provided that “every corporation, as snch has power: First, to have succession fey its corporate name, for the period limited in its charter, and when no period is limited, for twenty years.”

Read the full summary

Appeal from Crawford Circuit Court. — Eon. R. A. Breuer, Judge. (1) -By the general law in force at the time the Meramec Iron Company was incorporated it was provided that “every corporation, as snch has power: First, to have succession fey its corporate name, for the period limited in its charter, and when no period is limited, for twenty years.” G-. S. 1865, p. 362, sec. 1. And that “upon the dissolution of any corporation —the president and directors, or managers of the affairs of said corporation, at the time of its dissolution — shall fee trustees of such corporation, with full power to…

1Opinion of the CourtFaris, P. J.

— This- is an action to determine interest in certain real estate situate in Crawford County. Upon trial defendant had judgment, and plaintiff has appealed.

The common source of title is the Meramec Iron Company. Defendant claims through mesne conveyances from a sheriff’s deed bottomed upon a judgment and sale for taxes in an action instituted by publication against the Maramec -Iron Company. The plaintiff claims through a conveyance made in 1902 by all of the surviving directors of the Maramec Iron Com*398pany (sic), which conveyance was made pursuant to a written request of all the stockholders…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mumma v. Potomac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Pendleton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Nelson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Board of Commissioners v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. M.S. v. Dinkytown Day Care Center, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bruun v. Katz Drug Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Garden of Eden Drainage District v. Bartlett Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Christensen v. BossNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Turner v. BrowneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API