Stauffer, Eshleman & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtMoss, Judge
The sole question for determination in this case is whether or not the letter from plaintiff to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue dated October 4, 1920, may properly be treated as a claim for refund within the meaning of section 1324 (a) of the revenue act of 1921 (42 Stat. 227) and section 1113 of the act of 1926 (44 Stat. 116). The pertinent language of section 1324 (a) is as follows: “That upon the allowance of a claim for the refund of or credit for internal revenue taxes paid, interest shall be allowed and paid upon the total amount of such refund or credit * *
Section 1113 (a) of the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Wausau Sulphate Fibre Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- McKenney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- Semmes Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Allegheny Heating Co. v. LewellynDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936