Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Centex Real Estate Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 28, 1998No. 40541-1-IPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

Mark Griffith, Renee Griggs, Eugene Zielke, Julia Metcalf, and 162 other individuals (the Class) purchased homes from builder-vendor Centex Real Estate Corporation (Centex). After the paint began to peel off the cedar siding on their homes, they sued Centex, alleging breach of express warranty, negligent misrepresentation, and violations of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA). The trial court certified a class action, and later granted summaiy judgment dismissing its claims. Because the contract warranty had expired and the negligent misrepresentation claim is barred by the economic loss rule,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Alejandre v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Griffith v. Centex Real Estate Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Stieneke v. RussiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API