Legal Opinion
Funk v. Beverly
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1887No. 12,754PublishedCited by 5 opinions
From the Warren Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The alleged slanderous , words given as the-cause of action in the third paragraph of the appellant's complaint are these: “ I know all about that case; while she was out there claiming to be the wife of George W. Funk, she was back here'claiming to be my wife.” These words-do not impute a want of chastity and are not actionable perse. Emmerson v. Marvel, 55 Ind. 265; Schurich v. Kollman, 50 Ind. 336; K- v. H-, 20 Wis. 239. The court did. right in sustaining the demurrer to the third paragraph of the complaint.
*191The fourth paragraph of the complaint charges that the defendant wrote and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. MacKenzie v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Reynolds v. CopelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- K v. HWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
- Schurick v. KollmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Johnson v. StebbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. MinvielleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- State v. HosmerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Miller v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Campbell v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897