Miller v. McDonald
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, C. J.
The appellant sued the appellees for libel.
The two paragraphs of answer were, first, justification; and, second, that the publication was privileged.,The fact appears from the record, and is conceded by counsel, that the trial and special finding of the court in favor of the appellees were upon the appellees’ first paragraph of answer. The action of the court, therefore, in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the second paragraph of answer was harmless. Miller v. Rapp, 135 Ind. 614; Evansville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Maddux, 134 Ind. 571; McComas v. Haas, 93 Ind. 276.
The sufficiency of the first…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Boardman v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FentonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Thomas v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thrash v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Ayres v. BlevinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- City of Decatur v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnson v. WhippleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Campbell v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.