Schurick v. Kollman

The appellees sued the appellant for speaking slanderous words of the appellee Elizabeth, wife of the appellee Henry Kollman. The complaint lays the charge as follows:

“ That the defendant did, on,” etc., “at,” etc., “falsely, wickedly, and maliciously speak and utter, in a certain conversation then and there had and held by and between the defendant and one Sarah M, Mooth, and in the hearing of divers good people, and at divers times, of and concerning his said gold watch, and of and concerning the same having been stolen, and of and concerning the plaintiff Elizabeth and her character for…