State v. Tai N.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Appellant Tai N., arrested near the Canadian border while carrying 108 pounds of marijuana in his car, was found guilty of possession with intent to deliver. The primary issue is whether recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court imply a right to jury trial for juvenile offenses. We conclude they do not. Nor do they require alteration in the burden of proof governing manifest injustice dispositions. Washington’s juvenile justice code already requires the factual predicate for a manifest injustice disposition to be proved by clear and convincing evidence, a standard that in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.