Legal Opinion
State v. Meade
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 11, 2005No. 32209-9-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 P.3d 975 (2005)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Forrest C. MEADE, Appellant.
No. 32209-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
October 11, 2005.
Brett Dino Colacurcio, Grays Harbor County Prosecutor's Office, Montesano, WA, for Respondent.
John Lester Farra, Attorney at Law, Ocean Shores, WA, for Appellant.
BRIDGEWATER, J.
¶ 1 Forrest C. Meade, a juvenile, appeals the trial court's manifest injustice disposition. We hold that sufficient evidence supports the manifest injustice decision, which the trial court found by the "clear and convincing" standard that is equivalent to "beyond a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SchaafWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Orlando MoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- In re the Personal Restraint of HegneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- In Re HegneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.