Legal Opinion

State v. Meade

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 11, 2005No. 32209-9-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Forrest C. Meade, a juvenile, appeals the trial court’s manifest injustice disposition. We hold that sufficient evidence supports the manifest injustice decision, which the trial court found by the “clear and convincing” standard that is equivalent to “beyond a reasonable doubt” under State v. Rhodes, 92 Wn.2d 755, 760, 600 P.2d 1264 (1979), overruled on other grounds by State v. Baldwin, 150 Wn.2d 448, 461, 78 P.3d 1005 (2003). And we hold, based on State v. Schaaf, 109 Wn.2d 1, 743 P.2d 240 (1987), that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington1 does not entitle…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of HegneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. In Re HegneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API