Legal Opinion

Marriage of Fulmer v. Fulmer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1999No. C6-98-1799PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*212OPINION

HUSPENI,* Judge

Appellant contests the trial court’s use of earning capacity and refusal to consider debt incurred in satisfaction of the parties’ stipulated property award in calculating spousal maintenance. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Don Brian Fulmer and respondent Cathy Fulmer were married in 1975 and had three children during their 20-year marriage. The parties also co-owned Dog House Boarding Kennels, Inc., which operated one boarding kennel and two retail pet stores. In December 1995, the parties entered into a partial Marriage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Giesner v. GiesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Marriage of Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of: Lian Yang McGaughey v. William Howard Taft McGaughey, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Laura M. Engelhart, n/k/a Laura Hoss v. Robert J. EngelhartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Marriage of Fulmer v. FulmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API