Legal Opinion

Marriage of Fulmer v. Fulmer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1999No. C6-98-1799Published

1Opinion of the Court

594 N.W.2d 210 (1999)

In re the Marriage of Don Brian FULMER, petitioner, Appellant,

v.

Cathy L. FULMER, Respondent.

No. C6-98-1799.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 18, 1999.

Elizabeth M. Pierce, Messinger, Ojile Pierce, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis (for appellant).

Arthur W. Priesz, Jr., Priesz Law, Minneapolis (for respondent).

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, KLAPHAKE, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.

OPINION

HUSPENI,[*] Judge

Appellant contests the trial court's use of earning capacity and refusal to consider debt incurred in satisfaction of the parties' stipulated property award in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Giesner v. GiesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Marriage of Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API