Legal Opinion

Greiten v. La Dow

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1975No. 555 (1974)PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*594Robert W. Hansen, J.

Injured while working on a printing press for his employer, plaintiff started this action against the manufacturer and designer of the angle-iron device attached to the press, alleging a defect in design of the device.1 Ordinarily, one would expect this to be a products liability case. However, this approach would require the plaintiff to establish not only a defect in design but that such defect “was unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer.”2 Seeking to avoid this precondition to recovery, plaintiff brought and tried this case on the basis of negligence, claiming a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Vincer v. Esther Williams All-Aluminum Swimming Pool Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Netzel v. State Sand & Gravel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Morden v. Continental AGWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Sumnicht v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API