Legal Opinion
In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Bixby
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1948No. C.D. 3192PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
— Chapter 126, Laws of 1921, § 14, p. 414 (now codified as Rem. Rev. Stat., § 139-14 [P.P.C, § 273-43]), provides, in part, as follows:
“An attorney or counselor may be disbarred or suspended for any of the following causes arising after his admission to practice: 1. His conviction of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, in which case the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence. ... 6. For the commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption, whether the same be committed in the course of his relations as an attorney or counselor at law, or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- In re the Disbarment of HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ComynsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- State ex rel. Mackintosh v. RossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Saucedo v. NW Management & Realty Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.