Legal Opinion
United States v. Howard Ross and Paul Gordon
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 28, 1963No. 335, Docket 28033PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
These appeals concern another episode in the fraudulent career of Kimball Securities, Inc., one phase of which has recently been recounted in United States v. Aronson, 48 F.2d 319 (2 Cir.1963). Indeed, the two trials sprang from the same indictment. A preamble to this charged, substantially in the language of § 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q, that Kimball Securities, Inc., and numerous other persons, including Gordon and Ross, by the use of transportation and communication in interstate commerce and of the mails, employed a device, scheme and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. AgueciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Salvatore AnnunziatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne WhitmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. ShuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Dennis Geaney and Vincent Russell LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.